|

PTE Core Guide 2026: CLB Score Chart, Every Question Type, Tips & Resources

Last updated: September 2026. This guide was first published in 2024, after I sat PTE Core twice and used my score in a provincial nomination application. For this update I re-checked the CLB score chart, the PGWP language rules and provincial recognition, and corrected what had gone stale. The question-type tips are my original test experience, and they still apply. (Chinese original: PTE Core 簡明攻略)

(Version française: PTE Core: guide complet en français)

After sitting IELTS Academic until I was thoroughly sick of it, I thought I was finally done with language tests — until immigration reminded me I still needed a General one. Around that time Pearson announced a new exam built specifically for Canadian immigration, and after several launch delays PTE Core finally went live in February 2024. Two years on, it is no longer the niche newcomer it was: far more people take it, the question bank has grown, and almost every province recognizes it. This guide merges my original experience with the current state of the exam, so you can judge for yourself whether it still deserves its “easier than IELTS” reputation.

The short version

  • Who it suits: Express Entry, PNP and PGWP applicants who are stuck on IELTS speaking or writing and want fast results
  • Format: about 2 hours, all four skills in one sitting, fully computer-based and machine-scored
  • Results: officially within 5 days; in practice often within 48 hours — both of mine came quickly
  • Validity: 2 years, so time your test around your application
  • Critical: immigration accepts PTE Core only. Book PTE Academic by mistake and the score cannot be used for immigration
  • Your target: check the CLB chart below before anything else. CLB 7 is the common threshold; PGWP requires CLB 7 (university graduates) or CLB 5 (college graduates) in all four skills

PTE Core to CLB Score Chart

Set your target first, then practise for it. Score bands per Pearson’s official concordance (PTE Core scores run 10–90):

CLB Listening Reading Speaking Writing
10 89–90 88–90 89–90 90
9 82–88 78–87 84–88 88–89
8 71–81 69–77 76–83 79–87
7 60–70 60–68 68–75 69–78
6 50–59 51–59 59–67 60–68
5 39–49 42–50 51–58 51–59
4 28–38 33–41 42–50 41–50
3 18–27 24–32 34–41 32–40

Notice that the speaking and writing thresholds sit well above listening and reading — CLB 7 needs 68 in speaking and 69 in writing. That is exactly where most candidates need to focus, and exactly where PTE Core tends to be kinder than IELTS. Pearson revises this chart from time to time, so confirm the latest version on Pearson’s and IRCC’s websites before you book.

First, Set Your Target: Which CLB Do You Actually Need?

  • Express Entry: popular TEER 0/1 categories generally require CLB 7 in all four skills; TEER 2/3 start at CLB 5, and CLB 9 is where CRS points jump significantly
  • PGWP (language scores mandatory since November 2024): university degree graduates need CLB 7 in all four; college and other non-degree graduates need CLB 5 in all four
  • Provincial nominations: requirements vary by province and stream, anywhere from CLB 4 to CLB 7 — check your target program’s official page
  • Citizenship: CLB 4 in listening and speaking

Work out which band you need before you start practising. Plenty of people only need CLB 7 — there is no prize for grinding to CLB 9 if your program doesn’t ask for it.

Is PTE Core Still Easier in 2026?

When I wrote this guide in 2024, part of the “easier” verdict was an early-adopter dividend: a brand-new exam, a small question bank, and prediction materials that hit at a remarkable rate. Two years later, that part needs an honest update.

What has faded: the question bank keeps expanding and the prep industry has moved in. Claims like “half the exam came straight from the prediction files” no longer hold in 2026. Prediction materials (the famous 機經) still help — Repeat Sentence and Write From Dictation still repeat at a useful rate — but treating them as your only strategy will burn you.

What still holds — the structural advantages:

1. The content is a level easier. PTE Core is an everyday-life exam; all four skills are simpler than PTE Academic and the scenarios are drawn from daily life. I once showed the questions to a colleague who is nearly a native speaker: unfamiliar with the formats, she would only have scored in the seventies on a cold attempt. This is a properly built exam from a serious testing company — immigration authorities did not accredit a diploma mill.

2. Fully computer-based, machine-scored, introvert-friendly. Speaking and writing to a machine is simply less stressful than facing a human IELTS examiner — I switched precisely because my IELTS speaking confidence was holding me back, and my PTE scores came out far higher. One 2025 note: Pearson added new question types and human review elements to PTE Academic in August 2025, which rattled Academic candidates; per Pearson’s announced scope, that round of changes does not cover PTE Core, which remains fully machine-scored. Templates still need care, though: use them for structure and fluency, never as memorized text unrelated to the prompt.

3. You control the pace, and results are fast. The whole exam takes about two hours; fast finishers are out in ninety minutes, and the physical toll is nothing like IELTS. Results are promised within 5 days and often land within 48 hours — ideal when a deadline is close.

4. Seats are easier to book. It remains the smaller exam, so when IELTS dates sell out in big cities, PTE Core often still has near-term availability.

Practice Resources

YNWAC — my main practice platform

I started out on pte-core.com, which had solid audio drills for RS, ASQ and WFD. After it went behind a paywall, I switched to YNWAC and have used it ever since. Its most useful feature is the on-the-go audio players for exactly those three question types — Repeat Sentence loops, ASQ question-and-answer drills, and WFD dictation you can run on headphones anywhere — plus FIB-L vocabulary lists and AI speaking scoring. Membership is currently 5 CAD per month (promotional pricing; check the site for the latest). You can sign up on YNWAC and start practising right away. If you prefer being taught, they also run classes — a 1-week sprint and 2–4 week full courses; there is a course advisor QR code at the end of this guide.

APEUni PTE (猩際)

One of the few platforms with a dedicated PTE Core section. Its Core questions are close to the Academic set in difficulty, so filter for easy and medium and ignore the hard ones. Its speaking scores are notoriously harsh — do not let them shake your confidence; in my experience my real exam score came out at least 20 points higher. Accounts registered outside China are routed to the English interface with a different scoring model and question bank, so ask support to switch you to the Chinese version if that matters to you. Its full mock tests are worth it for rehearsing the exam flow.

Duomo PTE (多墨)

I only use this one for speaking scores, which land much closer to the real exam than APEUni’s. Handy for calibrating yourself in the final week.

(Prep platforms change their pricing and question banks constantly — check the current state when you use them.)

The platform I prepped with: YNWAC

On-the-go audio drills for RS, ASQ and WFD, plus AI speaking scoring — made for spare moments. Membership is currently CAD 5/month (promotional price; check the site).

Sign up on YNWAC and start practising →

Every Question Type, Explained

If you are new to PTE, the alphabet soup — DI, WFD, ASQ — is intimidating at first. They are just abbreviations for specific question types. One elegant PTE feature: many tasks score two skills at once. Repeat Sentence, for example, feeds both your speaking and your listening score, much like TOEFL’s integrated tasks.

PTE Core question types and which skills each one scores

Here is every type, in actual exam order.

Speaking & Writing

RA (Read Aloud): read a short text aloud after 35–40 seconds of preparation. A heavyweight task — “master RA and you master PTE,” as the saying goes — and it also feeds your reading score. Below CLB 7 ambitions, the technique is simply: read a lot. For high scores, work on thought groups, stress and linking. You can skip up to about five words you cannot pronounce (awkward names, places) with little damage. There is a folk trick of reading only one easy sentence for fluency marks, since completeness is not scored — I have always read the full text; try the trick at your own risk.

RS (Repeat Sentence): hear a short sentence, repeat it. A key task, and a hard one — but prediction files still catch several of them, and PTE Core sentences are short, everyday lines. If a sentence escapes you: completeness is not the scoring criterion. Catch the first two and last two words, say them in order without hesitation, and you will pick up decent marks. For practice, I use YNWAC’s RS audio player on loop during dead time — once the common sentence patterns are in your ear, the exam feels far calmer.

DI (Describe Image): describe a chart or picture. A key task. Aiming modest: use a template — repeat a frame like “From the picture, I can see…” and name everything visible. Aiming high: freestyle is fine too, it is roughly one IELTS speaking answer’s worth of speech. Either way, actually mention the image’s most obvious content; a template with zero reference to the picture is how people get burned.

RTS (Respond to a Situation): a PTE Core specialty — you are given an everyday scenario (“You booked a doctor’s appointment for 10, but traffic will make you late — explain to the clinic”). Low-effort approach: restate the prompt as a mini Read Aloud with pronouns adjusted (you → I).

ASQ (Answer Short Question): answer a general-knowledge question, usually in a word or two. It scores very little; do not sweat it. Prediction hit rates are high — one pass through the audio drills before the exam is enough.

SWT (Summarize Written Text): read a passage, summarize it in one sentence. Lift the topic sentences, stitch them with connectors, done. PTE Core writing is the easiest part of the exam: use simple sentences, spell everything correctly — full marks are realistic. Respect the word limit religiously; under or over means zero.

WE (Write Email): write an email per the prompt. A correct format template plus sequencing words and every point from the prompt covered gets you most of the marks. Same rules: simple sentences, no spelling errors, strict word limits.

Reading

FIB-RW (Fill in the Blanks — Reading & Writing): pick words from a dropdown. PTE Core texts are short and far more readable than IELTS; the focus is grammar and word meaning, so weaker readers should shore up vocabulary and collocations.

MCM (Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers): multiple-response reading. Wrong picks are penalized — if you are unsure, select only the answer you are most certain of.

RO (Re-Order Paragraphs): put jumbled paragraphs in order. Looks easy, is quietly logical and hard; prediction files historically catch 60–70% of these.

FIB-R (Fill in the Blanks — Reading): drag-and-drop version of the same skill as FIB-RW.

MCS (Multiple Choice, Single Answer): single-answer reading. Comparatively easy.

Listening

SST (Summarize Spoken Text): listen, then write a summary — SWT’s listening twin. Write what you heard, add connectors, obey the word limit.

MCM (Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers): listening version; same negative-marking caution — choose less when unsure.

FIB-L (Fill in the Blanks — Listening): type the missing words; watch word forms and tenses.

MCS (Multiple Choice, Single Answer): single-answer listening. Easier.

SMW (Select Missing Word): the final word of a recording is beeped out; pick it. You only need the gist of the first half — listen hard to the sentence right before the beep.

HIW (Highlight Incorrect Words): spot the words in the transcript that differ from the audio, usually 4–6. Read along as you listen. Wrong clicks are penalized.

WFD (Write From Dictation): type the sentence you hear. A heavyweight task. It used to demand endless drilling, but prediction hit rates remain high — watch for variants of memorized sentences. Trick: if you are unsure about singular/plural, type both forms; the scorer credits correct words present and does not extra-penalize wrong ones. For drilling, I use YNWAC’s WFD audio player on loop until the sentences type themselves — the highest return-on-effort habit in this whole exam.

Watch Out: Risks, Updated for 2026

1. Recognition is nearly universal now — but verify yours. Federally, IRCC accepts PTE Core for Express Entry, work permits and citizenship. In 2024 many provinces had not caught up; that has largely been fixed — even smaller provinces like Newfoundland and Labrador list PTE Core on their nomination pages now. Still, provincial streams update on their own schedules: before booking, confirm on your target province’s official program page, not just in guides like this one.

2. Do not book the wrong test. Immigration accepts PTE Core only, never PTE Academic. The names and booking pages look alike; a wrong booking wastes the fee and the weeks you waited.

3. Scores expire in 2 years. If your application is far away, do not test too early; if a PGWP or an invitation round is close, leave yourself room for a retake.

4. Test-centre audio is a real hazard. Position the microphone between your upper lip and the tip of your nose. Everyone speaks at once in the speaking section and it gets loud — stray voices on your recording cost marks. Finish each answer and move on immediately rather than leaving silence, and check recent test-centre reviews to dodge the bad rooms.

Start Practising

You have read the guide — what is left is reps. Two ways to go about it:

Way 1: Self-study

Focus your drilling on the RS, ASQ and WFD audio players and the AI speaking scores. The platform I use is YNWAC, currently CAD 5 per month.

Sign up on YNWAC →

Way 2: Prefer a class?

YNWAC runs a 1-week sprint class, 2–4 week full courses and 1-on-1 options. Scan the QR code to reach a course advisor (WeChat Work):

YNWAC course advisor QR code (WeChat Work)

Scan to add the course advisor and ask about the sprint and full courses.

FAQ

What score do I need for CLB 7?
Listening 60–70, Reading 60–68, Speaking 68–75, Writing 69–78 — each skill separately, not an average. Note speaking and writing demand more than listening and reading.

Is PTE Core really easier than IELTS General?
For most people stuck on speaking and writing, yes: everyday content, fully machine-scored, results in days. But the early prediction-file dividend has shrunk since 2024 — think of it now as a genuinely easier exam, not a memorize-and-win shortcut.

PTE Core vs PTE Academic — what if I booked the wrong one?
Academic is the study-abroad exam; Core is the one built for Canadian immigration, and IRCC accepts Core only. A wrong booking cannot be converted — you would have to rebook, so check the exam name carefully before paying.

How fast are results, and how long are they valid?
Officially within 5 days; commonly within 48 hours. Valid for 2 years from the test date.

Which provinces accept PTE Core?
As of 2026, the large majority of provincial nominee programs do, including Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador. Stream-level requirements still change — always confirm on the province’s official page.

Are prediction files (機經) still worth it?
Yes, in the right places: RS, WFD and ASQ still repeat at worthwhile rates, making them the best return on study time. RA and DI are about fundamentals and structure — do not count on seeing them beforehand.

Good luck — hope you clear your target CLB in one go.

Similar Posts

  • |

    沒有暴徒,只有暴政

    可見馬鞍山那一把火,燒出了不少理中客。 他們告訴你,我是絕對的理性中立客觀,火燒阿伯,天理難容,停止暴力。 姑且忽視掉是否為自導自演的那部分猜忌,本著「不分化不割席」的態度,講講那把火,講講裝修,講講勇武。 一些理中客前期包裝的非常好,說他們也是支持香港抗爭,支持爭取自由民主的。但是每次又會退一步兩頭拿好處,說警暴該譴責,暴徒也要追究,以示意自己站在一個絕對安全的「客觀」平臺上,此時便露出他們理中客的尾巴了。 對理中客的討論由來已久,「理性中立客觀」誠然是三個褒義詞,但為何「理中客」如今是個貶義詞,大概就是被這群人把名聲搞臭的。之前有個人對理中客做的類比,很有意思也被流傳到了中文推特圈,大意是:A說周杰倫沒偷蘋果,B說周杰倫偷了兩個蘋果,這時有個小C站出來說,你們別爭了,要我說大家都退一步,周杰倫只偷了一個蘋果好了。有時候,理中客就在做這樣的蠢事。其實核心映射的問題就一點,此例中偷竊行為已經觸犯到了一條底線,你不能簡單地折中,並且把這種行為稱之為是你的「中立」。我也曾拿網上之前流傳甚廣的一張哆啦A夢的圖給別人做過解釋,隨手找到並貼在了下面,其實也可以看到某些字眼跟理中客說過的話契合度有多高。這兩個例子無非是想告訴大是大非前,應該拿出你的良知去判斷,而不是依據現有框架。 何謂現有框架?你說裝修襲警這些行為在現有框架下犯法嗎,當然犯法。可是現有框架已經出了問題,為何還要以現有框架作為基準?上圖中有一個前提是「當胖虎開始霸凌大雄的時候」,稍微轉變一下,用「暴政」一詞替換「胖虎」,就是今日現況,也即是我為何說今日框架是有問題的。送中惡法通過了之後,送中也是法。是不是哪天出了一條毫無法理邏輯的「陳姓男子不得入境香港」的法案,所以滯留在香港境內的陳姓男子都在違法?加惡法兩字就是為了告訴你們,有些法已經出問題了,我在之前文章中提到法都順帶提了一句常規認知下,可如今並不在常規認知範疇內,法律不一定是底線,違法亦不等於破壞法治。 包括一些理中客雞蛋裡面挑骨頭,但凡違「法」他都要去插兩句,什麼警方已經舉了藍旗還不撤退這是不行的,都跟上述性質一樣。一味去維護「法」,連法都不公義,這大概就是為皇帝歌功頌德的奴才們會做的事吧,大清也有《大清律例》。今日之法比起《大清律例》有諸多不同,所以我們講我們進步了,可你今天要去維護一個最基本的「法」的概念而忽視其內容,實為開倒車。 進步源自哪裡——公民抗命。黑人不讓座在上世紀五十年代的美國就是不合法,但是今天人人知道那是種族歧視,其中少不了公民抗命的身影。引自維基的定義:公民抗命,又稱公民不服從,為在憲政體制下處於少數地位的公民表達異議的一種方式,是一種反對權的政治權利。沒錯,這是一種基本的政治權利,這項權利他本身就「違法」。再者後面還講到:公民的「反對權」就是指「公民不服從」,雖可能涉及違法的行為,卻是出於對「社會良知及正義」等公共利益的重視而不得已所採用的一種手段,是少數人出於對法律的尊重和表現的一種喚起多數人認同的非常手段。基於公民的道德、良知所從事的「公民不服從」,這是不同於一般的「暴民反抗」及「暴動」。「公民不服從」參與者的訴求,是否符合「社會良知及正義」的公共利益是須要訴諸社會多數人的認同所進行的一種抗爭行為。還是那句話,這就是在大是大非前要怎麼站隊了,請用自己的良知和公義去判斷,而不是暴政惡法。 被入獄的社會運動家太多了,因為他們觸犯了當時的「法」,乃至於現在有人認為入獄就是社會運動家的資本,成功之後自然功成名就,而我們如今在洪流中,則是等待並心懷希望吧。五大訴求真的缺一不可嗎,成立獨立調查委員會和撤銷所有抗爭者控罪兩項是衝突的,若最終真的有了獨立調查委員會,也一定會判處幾個象徵性的「暴徒」,當然公民抗命就是這樣的結局,這反而是在彰顯法治精神而非破壞法治,絕大多數被定罪者顯然也會接受,但是他們那時候會深知是他們贏了。 暴政成為事實時,社會契約失效,約束公民的不再是社會法,而是自然法。而自然法默許了一定程度的暴力反抗,以尋求最終的公義。 至此,有人還是認為違反的從「情理上」看「嚴重程度」不那麼重的法,比如無視藍旗、無視不反對通知書等等,可以被理解,但示威者暴力太過,暴力一定要譴責。 還是從框架有問題這個角度出發,按照社會契約的觀點,警察在人民授意,接受監管的前提下,成為了社會中唯一被允許合法使用暴力的群體。當這兩個前提如今已經失效時,已經不復存在「合法使用暴力」這一概念,任何人都可以使用暴力,你大可以繼續從情理上認為不對,但「暴徒」一詞已經站不住腳。 此處推薦一下《反思警權》這一系列文章。 雙標人士現在大概會退一步了,警察的社會契約無法維繫,也可以理解為所有人的暴力都是非法的,不合情理的,所以他們譴責警暴,也譴責暴徒。 我曾在 TG channel 裡面分享了這篇文章。KongU 教授,也是五年前「佔中三子」之一的戴耀廷,提出了一個「有原則暴力」的概念。示威者做的就是「有原則暴力」,相反警察是在無差別的濫暴,從這開始就體現出兩者的差別了。 何謂「有原則暴力」,最簡單的例子,政權更迭大多數都是在「有原則暴力」下實現的。但凡當權者要渲染自己是以何種公義正確的「有原則暴力」手段上位時,就不能去雙標香港的抗爭。正當防衛也叫「有原則暴力」,並非很晦澀的概念,當然戴耀廷本人認為這個標準因人而異,不過我舉的上述兩個例子基本不會有正常人反駁,說明還是存在一定的普世性的共識。 不過既然提到革命這個字眼了,有人就要說港獨問題了,簡單談兩句立場。畢竟我曾經看見「廢青」論的小粉紅是這麼論述的:真要革命真槍實彈上前線流血啊,像曱甴一樣見警察就亂竄,果然廢青。按民調結果看港獨支持率其實也不高,這裡面基於了很複雜因素的概念,比如獨立的中港關係之類的。但我也不從五大訴求沒有提港獨這些角度來開脫,逃來逃去搞得像港獨確實是一個貶義詞了。和臺獨汙名化一樣,其實這也是在汙名化港獨。上述講了這麼多,同理,國家安全法就不能算惡法了嗎?倘若國家安全法是惡法,那麼爭取港獨就是正當的。所以我是支持本土自決派的觀點,以包括香港獨立在內的各種手段實現本土自決,都是可取的。況且也有和平顏色革命的例子,香港之路就是效仿的波羅的海之路,一次歷史上非常成功的和平示威。若真是流血革命,其實這些小粉紅的意思也默認了有「有原則暴力」這個東西存在嘛,他們想諷刺港人沒種來達到羞辱目的而已,回到「有原則暴力」這個話題上。 那麼有點爭議的「有原則暴力」如何看待?武力也是分等級,警方的措辭中常會提到「最低武力」、「對等武力」這些詞,畢竟面對各國媒體他們也要找點臺階下,即使他們「最低武力」和「對等武力」如今也是在扯淡,門檻越來越高。畢竟我不是雙標狗,示威者也有「最低武力」和「對等武力」,不能濫暴這一點我也認同。那麼示威者濫暴是什麼,可能是真的殺人,顯然並沒有這種事情發生過。殺人絕對是違反任何正義體系的,包括在戰爭之中,大家的確都很忌諱這件事,一度擔心政府會自導自演一場殺人案來給示威者扣帽子。裝修其實是很好的做法,也算有原則的最低武力,我們可以明確的所有前提是,警暴在先,黑店在先,這些已經成為了事實。而且示威者之間有共識就是不拿店裡面的東西,原則處處可以體現,打砸搶燒終究只是既得利益者發了瘋似的意圖汙名化示威者的標籤。 訪談中戴耀廷引述的「A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil」就認為,當政府縱容制度暴力去威脅其他人的生命安全時,可以使用有效對等的武器去抗衡。這也叫「對等武力」。 既然講到了前提,其實這就是一個誰先誰後的簡單邏輯,也即是理中客最喜歡的情理,顯然他們連情理都站不住腳。無論裝修、私了還是襲警從來沒有主動出擊的情況,暴力的源頭其實就是警察,就是港共政府。第一次機場集會時十分平靜,有示威者就笑談這是因為那天機場沒有警察。這也是為何港共政府推出了與暴力割席的短片之後,大家立馬諷刺道:對,就是要和港共政府割席。 事實上戴耀廷本人也是提倡和平原則,他提到:「所以除非你是絕對的和平主義者,連破壞物品也當成是暴力,不然在每個人對防衛危險的主觀認知不同時,真的很難做出判斷。」比如你是天主教徒,你有教義不讓你去做暴力的行為,當然應該恪守自己的標準不去做。可以這麼釐清我的概念,標準針對自己,原則針對社會共識。但不分化不割席也是現今示威者的攻勢,所以大家自己不上前線,但是還是會對勇武心存感激,搞點諸如「非前線巴不嫁」的浪漫主義的話語,未嘗不是為這場悲劇增加幾分暖心的場景,具有現實意義。 概念講了一大堆,談談實際操作上出現過的問題,勇武也不是突然出現的,也有一個漸漸被接納的過程。早期的和理非抗爭,兩百萬人上街,林鄭還恬不知恥地站出來說了一句我們已經知道這回事了,然後就沒聲音了。兩百萬人是什麼規模?全世界震驚。小粉紅放黑屁說美國早就開槍的時候,從來沒想過如果兩百萬人在美國上街,早就在那個時刻就解決問題了。之後針對質疑一國兩制的問題時,林鄭繼續厚臉皮地說你們能上街正是一國兩制的體現,言下之意就是你們上就上唄,上完我該做啥繼續做啥。所以之後衝擊立法會的示威者才會在牆上塗字:「是你教我們和平遊行是沒用的」。這就是實際操作上最赤裸裸最現實的問題,你港共政府把震驚世界的大規模遊行當兒戲啊,所以得找更多刺激政府的升級手段,勇武從此被接納程度也越來越高。 非暴力不合作能成功,自然皆大歡喜,問題是他沒有成功。非暴力不合作最著名的領導者是甘地,但他自己也說過這種抗爭形式必須針對一個文明的政府,可惜香港現在面對的不是英國。暴徒只能指代在憲政民主制度下有和平渠道不用,而去非法使用暴力的人。顯然這個前提也被打破了,真正破壞法治的,正是港共政府。 另外非暴力合作也有非常有力的手段,比如全民換匯和無限期三罷,但被所謂「港豬」阻擋,這個詞用來指代一些政治冷感的人。港人也有人不支持勇武,一些淺黃立場有點飄搖不定的那種,可能早期也去參與過幾次遊行,但該返工還是返工。一是擔心秋後算賬,二是還是得生活下去。不過這次區議會選舉的大勝利,體現了沉默大多數的力量,倘若這種利好能持續下去,一定是非常擊中要害的。可惜事實上無法長期維繫這種不合作運動,香港抗爭就陷入這麼一個尷尬的局面,這始終是一個國際大都市,和我一樣在這幾個月去過一次你就會發現城市還是一樣在運轉,尤其是一些遠離示威場地的地方恍如隔世,一片靜好。 所以沒辦法,勇武們站了出來,無關緊要的地方就放在一邊吧,他們去掐住命脈。 有些人沒有經歷過全過程,還是以最初的態度去判斷現期的抗爭,無非是事不關己在一旁講風涼話,請明確現在已經進入大規模抗爭的第六個月了。 反之,經歷全過程,很大程度會影響一個人的決定。在幾個重要的事件時間點,一些和理非也紛紛加入了勇武的行列。這類記錄和理非轉變為勇武的心路歷程的文章也有不少,因主觀的感情色彩較重,不在此處介紹,有興趣可以在網上找一找。 其實當我審視我自身的時候,也發現如今的我和五年前我在聲援雨傘革命那段時間的心境變化了太多太多,同樣都是「支持」,只是一句「支持」過於籠統,細節太多不是一句「支持」可以概括的。 所以以前我大概會為了讓自己的話好聽一點,加上一句本文並非鼓勵暴力,僅僅是論述合理性這樣的話。不過如今我完全是不分化不割席的態度,內容諸君斟酌就好。 綜上,社會法失效時,公民有權以包括使用暴力在內的合乎自然法的手段尋求公正;公民抗命是一項基本的社會權利;暴力並不一定會破壞法治,有時反而有利於法治;有原則暴力早已被多次使用過;存在更有效的追求訴求的方式,但不和暴力抗爭這一形式衝突,兄弟爬山;面對暴政,實踐結果即為和平無用。 暴政之下無暴民,沒有暴徒,只有暴政。 When dictatorship is a fact, revolution becomes a duty.

  • |

    Alicization Revisiting

    看完亞次圓對 Alicization 第一話的點評之後,不由得發自內心地說,這著實講出了我的心聲,最前面一段文字,就引述所有亞次圓講過的東西,假裝已經寫在這兒了吧,視頻中沒有任何一句話和我想說的相悖。 很久沒有關注圈內的事情,但之前還是曾聽聞 Alicization TV 化這件事,只是沒有跟蹤動態,也沒守著等待十月新番。前幾天也是突然看見舊友分享了第一話,才突然想起這件事。之後由於看完第一話後過於激動,就把 Alicization 的小說翻出來再看一遍,目前進度是 Dividing。 猶想起初中的時候,那個真正「中二」的年代,十分沉迷於輕小說。我對入宅番這個定義一直很模糊,從小就看日本動畫長大,入宅番肯定沒人說哆啦A夢或是數碼寶貝,稍大一點跟著姐姐們看的一些東西也不能稱之為入宅番,甚至還直接把諸多美漫國漫排除在外,確實很符合中國「宅」圈的氛圍。這樣一考量,最符合中國「宅」圈定義的入宅番,說成是刀劍神域也沒有大錯。 不過讓我回答入輕小說坑的是哪一本書,那將會準確無誤地回答—— 是《刀劍神域》。 畢竟輕小說的定義要明朗許多。 繼續回想那個真正中二的年代,UW 篇的的確確是我當年最喜歡的一部分,甚至超過了本篇,這個喜歡的源頭說起來不是藝術成就,而是簡簡單單的愛麗絲這個名字,於文中很重要,於我也很重要,只不過我的愛麗絲是 Iris 而不是 Alice,真是一個有趣的烏龍。言歸正傳,那也是習慣在課本上亂塗亂畫的年代,總是會在一兩本作業冊的扉頁寫上「Alicization」,雖然意義不明,吃瓜的女同學還問我這是什麼意思。當時進入 ALO、GGO 劇情的時候,許多人發表觀點稱 SAO 中都沒有 SAO 了,真正的 SAO 已經完結。我也默默認同這個觀點,如今從稍微更有分析性的頭腦審視一遍,這幾部分在劇情設置上確實沒有很大亮點,會讓人覺得重複性有點大。但UW不一樣,她在當年就讓中二的我眼前一亮,雖然完全不可能基於劇作理論的層次去分析,但是我會由衷感嘆「真精彩」。 正如截圖中亞次圓的評價—— 「《刀劍神域》集大成之篇章」 刀劍畢竟也是有著「這本輕小說真厲害」多少連冠的頭銜,記不清也懶得考證了,總之確實很厲害。從這本輕小說真厲害這個排行榜出發,刀劍讓我開始了解業界許多東西,開始掉入坑中。且不論內容到底怎麼樣,誠如 UP 所說,刀劍向來有極好極壞兩個對立的評價。而我對刀劍一直定義為圈內現象級般的作品,小說 TV 都是現象級的熱門,我在 C94 會場回憶我對 Comic Market 的了解過程,印象最深刻的竟然是「Asuna 一人撐起 C86」的年代,真是各種各樣象徵「年代」的頭銜,賦予了刀劍這麼重要的地位,她可以去代表某個年代。 那個時候看的天聞角川的版本,當年的天聞角川以翻譯質量很爛名聲在外,當然近幾年好了很多。所以這次的溫習我選擇了臺灣角川的版本,且不論到底翻譯質量更勝一籌,在無法讀懂原著日文的前提下,換一個譯本也會帶來許多不同的驚喜。說起來情節已經忘掉了大半,並且當初仍在連載中沒有讀完,自己那時到底讀到哪裡,實際上已沒有印象。說是溫習,也是預習,愛麗絲的夢,我還未曾走到盡頭。 Alicization 第一話的評價很高,但之後會不會出現什麼問題,我並不敢保證。吃瓜群眾到時候也許會笑談 XX UP 把刀劍奶死了,但對於我們這群人來講,能看到愛麗絲她們動起來了,已經是感動到想哭。不過我也不妄加預測,拋去情懷的東西,第一話的水平真的是很高很高。 在脫宅許久搞不懂年輕人在漫展搞什麼對新番毫無興趣只知道一個 Ingress 而感嘆自己老了的今天,也是再拿著厚厚十幾本輕小說堆在我面前想讓我看,卻只會覺得痛苦的忙碌而又浮躁的今天,Alicization 能喚醒我年少時的感動,去喚醒我自身那顆年少熱血的生命力,這大概就是我去回憶她的意義所在。

  • |

    學渣的雅思經驗

    用 TOEFL 的 MyBest Scores 標準圓一下我的菜成績吧,真希望 IELTS 也能跟進這個制度,雖然跟進了也還是不夠: L: 6.5 R: 8.0 W: 6.5 S: 5.5 本人實質上是處於「過了,但是沒完全過」的狀態,總分已到 6.5,但是仍被卡在口語 5.5。一直覺得該成績太菜沒寫經驗,不過今天還是決定分享一點小心得,以後若有什麼進步也可以更新。申請要求 7 乃至 7.5 的大佬以及同是卡口語的天涯淪落人可以直接關掉本文了。 不過我向那些想達標其他三項的讀者保證本文一定乾貨滿滿,老實說我以前看網上經驗文時覺得千篇一律,扯來扯去都是那幾句話,而我會提到很多跟網上的經驗文完全不一樣的點。 另外,本文完全是應試觀點,助你們快速達標,對真實英語水平的提高也許沒啥用,會比較激進,那麼廢話不多說開講: 一. 詞彙量 二 . 聽力 我聽力是最弱的,高考聽力我都會錯一半以上,高中聽力對我來說都夠嗆。第一次考雅思我的聽力才 5 分,四項最低,6.5 雖然不高,但從 5 分一路走來,還是成就滿滿。 三. 閲讀 閲讀 8 倒是算得上稍微有點談資的一項,然而我並無太多經驗可授。 四. 寫作 中國學生卡寫作和口語,所幸我寫作沒被卡。 五. 口語 無甚可講……不過一些失敗例子對你們也許也是可貴的財富。 六. 其他 祝您上岸! 後記(2026 年更新):後來辦移民的時候,我沒有再戰雅思,改考了 PTE Core,考了兩場,最後用它的成績入池了省提名。如果你也被雅思口語寫作卡住,可以看看我的 PTE…

  • |

    PTE Core en français 2026 : tableau CLB, toutes les épreuves, conseils et ressources

    Dernière mise à jour : septembre 2026. Ce guide a été publié pour la première fois en 2024, après que j’ai passé le PTE Core à deux reprises et utilisé mon résultat dans une demande de désignation provinciale. Pour cette mise à jour, j’ai revérifié le tableau de correspondance CLB, les règles linguistiques du permis…

  • |

    8月 INGRESS 戰報

    這個系列應該快涼了吧,能想到的漸漸開始變少,已經記載不動日常遊戲了,日後若是有 Event 和搞事活動再著重寫一寫吧。 月初幾天在瘋狂約飯,在華新街還曾有某綠軍邀我一起吃晚飯,想來藍綠關係還真是和諧啊。 札幌的 XMA 是沒去成的,畢竟 C94 為大(逃。8月4號的時候應該四國某個地方有場 MD 吧,但還是太早了,就不能十幾號辦一場嗎!可惜由於遇上了18號熱帶氣旋,航班被取消了,首日早上去關西機場中轉了一次,到達 Big Sight 的時候已經將近中午十二點了。 回到正題,在日期間除了在秋葉原完成了 一套刀叉菊苣推薦的秋葉原電器街任務,其餘的就是在不斷地 UPV/C 了。以前還是太 Naive,竟然揚言要拿 5000 UPV,最後似乎連 2000 都沒拿到。UPV 5000 紀念達成地點:廣島猿猴橋。但是記錯了,我以為是有牌子的!UPV 黑牌原來要 3w!那也太難了8 另外同樣是在秋葉原,成功升到 12 級,可以加入小猩猩行列了。 回澳門之後找蛋散姐要了一套預習資料,通過了 OPR 考試,開始奮鬥審 po 牌了!現實遠遠比想像更殘酷啊,審 po 真的是超級累的一件事,不能一蹴而就,特別是等 Agreement 還要好久,迄今銅牌都還沒能開到。 月底還有一件事就是8月25日的 XMA 了,亞洲兩場,新加坡和韓國仁川。我……自然是都沒錢去了,不過還是參加了珠海組織的 Offsite 組充電活動。這算起來是第一次見到珠藍的各位大佬,另外此次充電活動是和中山一起組織的,也是見到了不少中山的大佬。 果然沒什麼好講的了(:з」∠)  其實對比起最早寫這個系列的心態,我算是已經走出來了吧,這樣的話就再好不過了。

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *