|

PTE Core Guide 2026: CLB Score Chart, Every Question Type, Tips & Resources

Last updated: September 2026. This guide was first published in 2024, after I sat PTE Core twice and used my score in a provincial nomination application. For this update I re-checked the CLB score chart, the PGWP language rules and provincial recognition, and corrected what had gone stale. The question-type tips are my original test experience, and they still apply. (Chinese original: PTE Core 簡明攻略)

(Version française: PTE Core: guide complet en français)

After sitting IELTS Academic until I was thoroughly sick of it, I thought I was finally done with language tests — until immigration reminded me I still needed a General one. Around that time Pearson announced a new exam built specifically for Canadian immigration, and after several launch delays PTE Core finally went live in February 2024. Two years on, it is no longer the niche newcomer it was: far more people take it, the question bank has grown, and almost every province recognizes it. This guide merges my original experience with the current state of the exam, so you can judge for yourself whether it still deserves its “easier than IELTS” reputation.

The short version

  • Who it suits: Express Entry, PNP and PGWP applicants who are stuck on IELTS speaking or writing and want fast results
  • Format: about 2 hours, all four skills in one sitting, fully computer-based and machine-scored
  • Results: officially within 5 days; in practice often within 48 hours — both of mine came quickly
  • Validity: 2 years, so time your test around your application
  • Critical: immigration accepts PTE Core only. Book PTE Academic by mistake and the score cannot be used for immigration
  • Your target: check the CLB chart below before anything else. CLB 7 is the common threshold; PGWP requires CLB 7 (university graduates) or CLB 5 (college graduates) in all four skills

PTE Core to CLB Score Chart

Set your target first, then practise for it. Score bands per Pearson’s official concordance (PTE Core scores run 10–90):

CLB Listening Reading Speaking Writing
10 89–90 88–90 89–90 90
9 82–88 78–87 84–88 88–89
8 71–81 69–77 76–83 79–87
7 60–70 60–68 68–75 69–78
6 50–59 51–59 59–67 60–68
5 39–49 42–50 51–58 51–59
4 28–38 33–41 42–50 41–50
3 18–27 24–32 34–41 32–40

Notice that the speaking and writing thresholds sit well above listening and reading — CLB 7 needs 68 in speaking and 69 in writing. That is exactly where most candidates need to focus, and exactly where PTE Core tends to be kinder than IELTS. Pearson revises this chart from time to time, so confirm the latest version on Pearson’s and IRCC’s websites before you book.

First, Set Your Target: Which CLB Do You Actually Need?

  • Express Entry: popular TEER 0/1 categories generally require CLB 7 in all four skills; TEER 2/3 start at CLB 5, and CLB 9 is where CRS points jump significantly
  • PGWP (language scores mandatory since November 2024): university degree graduates need CLB 7 in all four; college and other non-degree graduates need CLB 5 in all four
  • Provincial nominations: requirements vary by province and stream, anywhere from CLB 4 to CLB 7 — check your target program’s official page
  • Citizenship: CLB 4 in listening and speaking

Work out which band you need before you start practising. Plenty of people only need CLB 7 — there is no prize for grinding to CLB 9 if your program doesn’t ask for it.

Is PTE Core Still Easier in 2026?

When I wrote this guide in 2024, part of the “easier” verdict was an early-adopter dividend: a brand-new exam, a small question bank, and prediction materials that hit at a remarkable rate. Two years later, that part needs an honest update.

What has faded: the question bank keeps expanding and the prep industry has moved in. Claims like “half the exam came straight from the prediction files” no longer hold in 2026. Prediction materials (the famous 機經) still help — Repeat Sentence and Write From Dictation still repeat at a useful rate — but treating them as your only strategy will burn you.

What still holds — the structural advantages:

1. The content is a level easier. PTE Core is an everyday-life exam; all four skills are simpler than PTE Academic and the scenarios are drawn from daily life. I once showed the questions to a colleague who is nearly a native speaker: unfamiliar with the formats, she would only have scored in the seventies on a cold attempt. This is a properly built exam from a serious testing company — immigration authorities did not accredit a diploma mill.

2. Fully computer-based, machine-scored, introvert-friendly. Speaking and writing to a machine is simply less stressful than facing a human IELTS examiner — I switched precisely because my IELTS speaking confidence was holding me back, and my PTE scores came out far higher. One 2025 note: Pearson added new question types and human review elements to PTE Academic in August 2025, which rattled Academic candidates; per Pearson’s announced scope, that round of changes does not cover PTE Core, which remains fully machine-scored. Templates still need care, though: use them for structure and fluency, never as memorized text unrelated to the prompt.

3. You control the pace, and results are fast. The whole exam takes about two hours; fast finishers are out in ninety minutes, and the physical toll is nothing like IELTS. Results are promised within 5 days and often land within 48 hours — ideal when a deadline is close.

4. Seats are easier to book. It remains the smaller exam, so when IELTS dates sell out in big cities, PTE Core often still has near-term availability.

Practice Resources

YNWAC — my main practice platform

I started out on pte-core.com, which had solid audio drills for RS, ASQ and WFD. After it went behind a paywall, I switched to YNWAC and have used it ever since. Its most useful feature is the on-the-go audio players for exactly those three question types — Repeat Sentence loops, ASQ question-and-answer drills, and WFD dictation you can run on headphones anywhere — plus FIB-L vocabulary lists and AI speaking scoring. Membership is currently 5 CAD per month (promotional pricing; check the site for the latest). You can sign up on YNWAC and start practising right away. If you prefer being taught, they also run classes — a 1-week sprint and 2–4 week full courses; there is a course advisor QR code at the end of this guide.

APEUni PTE (猩際)

One of the few platforms with a dedicated PTE Core section. Its Core questions are close to the Academic set in difficulty, so filter for easy and medium and ignore the hard ones. Its speaking scores are notoriously harsh — do not let them shake your confidence; in my experience my real exam score came out at least 20 points higher. Accounts registered outside China are routed to the English interface with a different scoring model and question bank, so ask support to switch you to the Chinese version if that matters to you. Its full mock tests are worth it for rehearsing the exam flow.

Duomo PTE (多墨)

I only use this one for speaking scores, which land much closer to the real exam than APEUni’s. Handy for calibrating yourself in the final week.

(Prep platforms change their pricing and question banks constantly — check the current state when you use them.)

The platform I prepped with: YNWAC

On-the-go audio drills for RS, ASQ and WFD, plus AI speaking scoring — made for spare moments. Membership is currently CAD 5/month (promotional price; check the site).

Sign up on YNWAC and start practising →

Every Question Type, Explained

If you are new to PTE, the alphabet soup — DI, WFD, ASQ — is intimidating at first. They are just abbreviations for specific question types. One elegant PTE feature: many tasks score two skills at once. Repeat Sentence, for example, feeds both your speaking and your listening score, much like TOEFL’s integrated tasks.

PTE Core question types and which skills each one scores

Here is every type, in actual exam order.

Speaking & Writing

RA (Read Aloud): read a short text aloud after 35–40 seconds of preparation. A heavyweight task — “master RA and you master PTE,” as the saying goes — and it also feeds your reading score. Below CLB 7 ambitions, the technique is simply: read a lot. For high scores, work on thought groups, stress and linking. You can skip up to about five words you cannot pronounce (awkward names, places) with little damage. There is a folk trick of reading only one easy sentence for fluency marks, since completeness is not scored — I have always read the full text; try the trick at your own risk.

RS (Repeat Sentence): hear a short sentence, repeat it. A key task, and a hard one — but prediction files still catch several of them, and PTE Core sentences are short, everyday lines. If a sentence escapes you: completeness is not the scoring criterion. Catch the first two and last two words, say them in order without hesitation, and you will pick up decent marks. For practice, I use YNWAC’s RS audio player on loop during dead time — once the common sentence patterns are in your ear, the exam feels far calmer.

DI (Describe Image): describe a chart or picture. A key task. Aiming modest: use a template — repeat a frame like “From the picture, I can see…” and name everything visible. Aiming high: freestyle is fine too, it is roughly one IELTS speaking answer’s worth of speech. Either way, actually mention the image’s most obvious content; a template with zero reference to the picture is how people get burned.

RTS (Respond to a Situation): a PTE Core specialty — you are given an everyday scenario (“You booked a doctor’s appointment for 10, but traffic will make you late — explain to the clinic”). Low-effort approach: restate the prompt as a mini Read Aloud with pronouns adjusted (you → I).

ASQ (Answer Short Question): answer a general-knowledge question, usually in a word or two. It scores very little; do not sweat it. Prediction hit rates are high — one pass through the audio drills before the exam is enough.

SWT (Summarize Written Text): read a passage, summarize it in one sentence. Lift the topic sentences, stitch them with connectors, done. PTE Core writing is the easiest part of the exam: use simple sentences, spell everything correctly — full marks are realistic. Respect the word limit religiously; under or over means zero.

WE (Write Email): write an email per the prompt. A correct format template plus sequencing words and every point from the prompt covered gets you most of the marks. Same rules: simple sentences, no spelling errors, strict word limits.

Reading

FIB-RW (Fill in the Blanks — Reading & Writing): pick words from a dropdown. PTE Core texts are short and far more readable than IELTS; the focus is grammar and word meaning, so weaker readers should shore up vocabulary and collocations.

MCM (Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers): multiple-response reading. Wrong picks are penalized — if you are unsure, select only the answer you are most certain of.

RO (Re-Order Paragraphs): put jumbled paragraphs in order. Looks easy, is quietly logical and hard; prediction files historically catch 60–70% of these.

FIB-R (Fill in the Blanks — Reading): drag-and-drop version of the same skill as FIB-RW.

MCS (Multiple Choice, Single Answer): single-answer reading. Comparatively easy.

Listening

SST (Summarize Spoken Text): listen, then write a summary — SWT’s listening twin. Write what you heard, add connectors, obey the word limit.

MCM (Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers): listening version; same negative-marking caution — choose less when unsure.

FIB-L (Fill in the Blanks — Listening): type the missing words; watch word forms and tenses.

MCS (Multiple Choice, Single Answer): single-answer listening. Easier.

SMW (Select Missing Word): the final word of a recording is beeped out; pick it. You only need the gist of the first half — listen hard to the sentence right before the beep.

HIW (Highlight Incorrect Words): spot the words in the transcript that differ from the audio, usually 4–6. Read along as you listen. Wrong clicks are penalized.

WFD (Write From Dictation): type the sentence you hear. A heavyweight task. It used to demand endless drilling, but prediction hit rates remain high — watch for variants of memorized sentences. Trick: if you are unsure about singular/plural, type both forms; the scorer credits correct words present and does not extra-penalize wrong ones. For drilling, I use YNWAC’s WFD audio player on loop until the sentences type themselves — the highest return-on-effort habit in this whole exam.

Watch Out: Risks, Updated for 2026

1. Recognition is nearly universal now — but verify yours. Federally, IRCC accepts PTE Core for Express Entry, work permits and citizenship. In 2024 many provinces had not caught up; that has largely been fixed — even smaller provinces like Newfoundland and Labrador list PTE Core on their nomination pages now. Still, provincial streams update on their own schedules: before booking, confirm on your target province’s official program page, not just in guides like this one.

2. Do not book the wrong test. Immigration accepts PTE Core only, never PTE Academic. The names and booking pages look alike; a wrong booking wastes the fee and the weeks you waited.

3. Scores expire in 2 years. If your application is far away, do not test too early; if a PGWP or an invitation round is close, leave yourself room for a retake.

4. Test-centre audio is a real hazard. Position the microphone between your upper lip and the tip of your nose. Everyone speaks at once in the speaking section and it gets loud — stray voices on your recording cost marks. Finish each answer and move on immediately rather than leaving silence, and check recent test-centre reviews to dodge the bad rooms.

Start Practising

You have read the guide — what is left is reps. Two ways to go about it:

Way 1: Self-study

Focus your drilling on the RS, ASQ and WFD audio players and the AI speaking scores. The platform I use is YNWAC, currently CAD 5 per month.

Sign up on YNWAC →

Way 2: Prefer a class?

YNWAC runs a 1-week sprint class, 2–4 week full courses and 1-on-1 options. Scan the QR code to reach a course advisor (WeChat Work):

YNWAC course advisor QR code (WeChat Work)

Scan to add the course advisor and ask about the sprint and full courses.

FAQ

What score do I need for CLB 7?
Listening 60–70, Reading 60–68, Speaking 68–75, Writing 69–78 — each skill separately, not an average. Note speaking and writing demand more than listening and reading.

Is PTE Core really easier than IELTS General?
For most people stuck on speaking and writing, yes: everyday content, fully machine-scored, results in days. But the early prediction-file dividend has shrunk since 2024 — think of it now as a genuinely easier exam, not a memorize-and-win shortcut.

PTE Core vs PTE Academic — what if I booked the wrong one?
Academic is the study-abroad exam; Core is the one built for Canadian immigration, and IRCC accepts Core only. A wrong booking cannot be converted — you would have to rebook, so check the exam name carefully before paying.

How fast are results, and how long are they valid?
Officially within 5 days; commonly within 48 hours. Valid for 2 years from the test date.

Which provinces accept PTE Core?
As of 2026, the large majority of provincial nominee programs do, including Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador. Stream-level requirements still change — always confirm on the province’s official page.

Are prediction files (機經) still worth it?
Yes, in the right places: RS, WFD and ASQ still repeat at worthwhile rates, making them the best return on study time. RA and DI are about fundamentals and structure — do not count on seeing them beforehand.

Good luck — hope you clear your target CLB in one go.

Similar Posts

  • |

    PTE Core 攻略 2026:CLB 對照表、全部題型技巧、機經與模板

    最後更新:2026 年 9 月。本文首發於 2024 年,作者親自考了兩場 PTE Core,並以 PTE Core 成績單作為材料入池省提名。這次更新核對了最新的 CLB 對照、PGWP 語言要求、各省認可情況,並修正了已經過時的說法;題型技巧部分基本保留原經驗,仍然有效。 (本文另有英文版:PTE Core Guide — English Version,可直接分享給英文讀者。) (本文另有法文版:PTE Core: guide complet en français。) 曾經考雅思 A 類考到吐時就有過要轉 PTE 的念頭,最後還是沒轉,沒想到移民前仍然沒辦法完全和雅思分手——別忘了你還得考 G 類呢!學術 A 類、生活 G 類固有些許不同,但我實在對雅思 PTSD。從 PTE 要推出一款加拿大移民局認可的新考試的消息一流出,我就密切關注,期間還經歷官方上線跳票好幾次,一直拖到 2024 年 2 月 PTE Core 才正式上線。兩年多過去,它早已不是當年那個小眾新考試:報考的人多了,題庫擴充了,各省也基本都認可了。這篇攻略把當年的經驗和現在的情況合併更新,幫你判斷它還適不適合你。 先說結論(趕時間的看這裡) 適合誰:要走 EE、省提名、畢業工簽(PGWP),卡在雅思口語寫作、想要出分快的人 考試時長:約 2 小時,一次考完聽說讀寫,全程機考、機器評分 出分:官方說法 5…

  • |

    也許是一篇年終總結?

    剛剛收到了域名商發來的催款郵件,不知不覺時間又過去了一年。意味著這個 site 又鹹魚了一年,到頭來還是沒有養成寫博客的習慣。 還有十來天即是年底,已經放了聖誕假,也是從澳門飛回重慶的第三天了,回家的甜蜜滋味(就是本鹹魚玩了一整天遊戲)似乎讓我忘記了前幾天內心活動豐富時,總想著要寫一篇「年終總結」,也因為懶惰不了了之。空出來這麼多時間仔細回想一下,2017 年的確是發生了太多事情,值得作一篇「年終總結」。 年初幾月也沒什麼好說,和萬千高三生一樣的生活,只是感覺自己過得沒有傳說中那麼艱苦。想起以前看雞湯片《全城高考》  時下面有影評講到:「高考哪裡有這麼恐怖,又是離婚又是車禍的。」如今我也能以「過來人」的身分講一句確實如此了吧?當然那種勤奮的同學固然有,結局也是她取得了比我不知高到哪裡去的好成績。也不知道自己是不是覺得已成定局,最後幾個月蠻浪的,和幾個老哥一起開談創業的事情了。倒不是幾個人都在做白日夢,和我成績差不多的創建者老哥,憑著其他優勢通過自主招生進入東南大學,而自己的某 985 自主招生依然敗在了終審上面(捂臉)。那時候想要是能做一個「玩世不恭」的人就好了,現在才明白真正玩世不恭的人根本不會在意自己是不是玩世不恭,真正玩世不恭的人也許是像我最後幾個月這麼浪最後還是考上 C9 的人吧(逃 後來結局就是應驗了一個多年前立下的 flag。當時看見別人在回憶中寫下「離開了那一年黑色的六月」,隨口說到沒準自己到那時候也會寫下這樣的文字。於是乎,這個橫跨數年的 flag 終於出現了,自己的高考成績非常不理想,連最能引以為傲的一科,都考出了高中三年最差的一次。父母堅決反對我去偏遠地區的 211 大學,又不願意只讀一個普通一本,家境並不好的我也不能承擔高昂的留學費用,最終在所有因素共同作用下,一個人帶著幾大包來到了澳門。以至於後來在香港做義工時和帶隊小姐姐閒聊時,自己也戲謔地說道:「這一切都是命運的選擇啊。」 來澳門的爭議大到現在家裡都還沒消停,澳門教育質量根本不被人了解,澳門留給大家的印象應該只有夜晚的紙醉金迷。隔壁香港就好多了,真要說有些學校我能申請得上,但終歸是前面說過的原因,家裡負擔不了。有能力的人當然還可以選擇去爭取全額獎學金,但只能低空掠過的我是沒機會了,所以終究還是能力差了一些。我相信學習的過程本就是讓我成長,這半年我確確實實收穫了很多,也很愛這個地方,拋開其他東西不說,周圍珠三角每個城市都特別棒,再除開一些特別的原因,我對粵港澳大灣區的未來抱有很大的希望。 自己真正接觸編程也是從現在開始的,當初雄心壯志和幾位基友一起參加信息學競賽,自然是敗下陣來,也沒再繼續,如今進入這個專業也可以把這一項技能給撿回來了,無論是內地的本地的還是葡國來的同學都非常友好(除了是個和尚班以外)。但我真的是小白啊,網路上的 blog 多是程序猿們發表的技術文章,如今哪還有這麼多抒發書生牢騷的博主了?這也是閒置網站這麼久的原因之一吧,發技術文我還沒到火候,只是一個連期末考試都還要擔心掛不掛科的大學狗。不知是和學霸一起混久了,總給同學一個我也是大佬的印象?可惜面對 Programming 我真的是小白! 所幸自己還有那麼一點點的「應試能力」,在最終成績上並沒有那麼難堪,雖說也不能拔尖。學習上當然得靠自己努力,但話又說回「想做點什麼」這個問題上,自己參加的兩個項目在今年總算是進入正軌了。年初和高中同學組建的工作室現在倒是擱淺,即使無論從資本還是技術上來說,這個工作室的條件都更成熟,不過限制於成員因素,現在成為了一個粽子狀態。仍然很感謝能碰到這一群志同道合的朋友們。 最為自由的事情,還是發生在赴澳之後。留長髮,肝主機……也不一定非要評判這些事是好是壞,新事物或者以前是不能實現的事情肯定算是體驗了很多。澳門的氣氛也更為開放,課上有些東西內地是肯定聽不見的(逃……我並不想摻和政治,有自己獨特的立場,這些問題就不再贅述。但是現在患上了嚴重的谷歌依賴症是真,谷歌的產品不得不說還是好用。這兩天回國日常就是每次打開 Chrome 默認搜索打不開時就會 emmm…… 【此段不符合我現在的情況,先刪除!】 毫無邏輯的文章,想哪寫哪,以此紀念 2017 這富有意義的一年。本站也沒有什麼訪客,自然是私人日記了,有空回憶起什麼再補充一二吧。

  • |

    與女利主義的共處

    很遺憾我終於領悟了感情中最致命的爭議的確是錢。雖不是第一次聽到這個說法,但卻是第一次表達認同。 大夢初醒,不得不讓我開始再次審視「田園女權」或是「女利主義者」是如何在包裝自己。 我曾經在《中國女權觀察》一文中就早已剖析到,經濟獨立才是女性獲得地位的標誌。然而當我真的親耳聽到「讓我付錢其實算我的一個雷區,男生就該出所有錢。」這種世紀金句後,驚耳駭目,至今未得平靜,可謂是患上了小仙女 PTSD 。 此等明言追求利益之語,無蘊含任何平等之理,謂之女利者爾。女方到底是在找提款機,還是在找男朋友,我是不得而知。況且女方自詡是為爭取女性權益盡心盡力,亦稱認可我的觀點,喜歡我的文章,即上引之文也已讀過,一時我竟不知她是否在反串。 近來我瀏覽不少相親平臺,像是微博的拯救大齡二次元,只是想擁有更大的樣本去概括女性的基本要求和思想——其實大家都很正常。 川渝地區向來以女性地位高而美名在外,我就看見一位重慶的女性投稿人在戀愛觀中寫到:「男生也是爹媽的寶貝,也是作為一個獨立的個體長大,所以我不需要你一味遷就我,心疼包容都是相互的。」亦提到禮物方面應是互送,且她會送價值相等的東西。家鄉的妹子,煞是動人。 當然我也不搞地域黑,來看看一位廣州女性投稿人,她的老鄉,是怎麼說的。總體上,她還是要求男性應當大方,限定在財力範圍內即可。她的故事,是遇上了某個前男友,為他自己很捨得花錢,卻不肯在她身上花錢。我必須附議,這是大忌,我的情況恰恰相反,我甚至自己在家只吃券後三塊的外賣來省錢,和她在一起時請吃高端日料,從未有怨言。這位投稿人還補充到,當然如果你本身是很節儉的人,我會陪你一起節儉,這就是她對財力範圍的包容及理解。所以說縱觀下來,大家都很正常。 相反她倒是故事中的那類人,頻繁給自己買了很多好東西,卻只會一直對我說沒錢,異地期間一次沒來找過我,都是我找她。她「沒錢」期間買的每件東西,都比往返機票來得貴。我直言這個問題之後,她的回答是:「這麼便宜那你還不幫我買了?」男生一定得心疼女孩子,每次搶奪輿論高地,都快得驚人,不止這一個方面。 後來有女性友人讓我看豆瓣小組娛樂,討論中常常會出現一個「摳男」的詞,指代不合時宜的極端節省以及本身富裕但不肯為女方付出的人。很顯然我面對她時從來沒有「摳」過,更不是後者,她卻仍不滿意,暴露出了貪婪本性。 在我動想分手念頭最重的時候,聽了我故事的好友是這麼評價的: 總感覺她是在傳統女性和現代女性這兩個角色之間掙扎。 某友 一句非常委婉的說辭,我翻譯一下,這叫「縫合怪」。既想好處收盡,又不想承擔任何責任。關係在她們面前只是消遣,從來不是責任。 把這個矛盾推上頂峰的話題,就是彩禮,我平生厭惡至極的陋習。而我後來發現,因這個話題而破裂的關係,不在少數。感情中最核心的組件,唯錢是也。 一個「進步女性」隔三岔五就把彩禮掛在嘴邊,令人匪夷所思。 彩禮是什麼東西呢?男女結婚時,新郎或其家庭給予新娘父母的一部分金錢、財產或禮物。從人類學角度來看,在古代時彩禮是一種市場經濟行為,用以交換新娘家庭所損失的勞動力,及賠償她家庭中直系親屬的缺失。這也是大多數反彩禮的人會提到的一點,彩禮是「賣女兒」的陋習。 她號稱要和我一起移民,我一句話就嗆到她啞口無言:「加拿大人不要彩禮。」難道支女要自比中國女權已經進步到遠勝北美了?我想來不屑於用「支女」這種侮辱性的表達,今日確實想破戒了。活生生的典例,根本沒學到西方女權平等的精髓,不知在何處看了田園女權的東西在瞎起鬨。 同理,一些嫁給外裔的女性,哪怕是在國內生活的,也隻字不提彩禮了,知道只會自討沒趣。這種雙標才是最令我寒心。硬要讓我簡介一番自己的話,除了這身皮還是小黃人,再無其他東西是黃的了。跟我也別談彩不彩禮的話題,如果有人談了,只能說明此人根本沒有真正了解我。我在復盤的這段時間也得出了結論,事實如此,那個人從未真正了解我。 讓我們回到上文提到的豆瓣小組,其中不乏支持彩禮的用戶,我來一一駁倒謬論。 核心論點一:彩禮是對女性的生育補償。其實還滿有道理的,國男就吃這一套,國男滿口都是生育,但她們顯然挑錯了對象,我豈能跟國男是一批人?生育於我而言無關緊要。況且生育率的數據大眾都能看見,年輕女孩個個都說不生孩子要丁克,她也是其一,既然我們早已達成了共識,「生育補償」一說不是不攻自破嗎?想要生育補償的小仙女們就去找國男吧,一個願打一個願挨,婚姻本來就只是一個市場。 核心論點二:彩禮是買斷的冠姓權。我承認也有道理,但其實我跟上述態度一樣,從來不在乎這些東西,孩子要跟女方姓無所謂啊。任正非三個子女三個姓,越是厲害的人越不會在意這些細枝末節。 核心論點三:彩禮是遠嫁補償。這就回到市場經濟行為的那一段表述了,這是女方家中少了一人而索要補償的「買賣人口」行為。時至現代了,交通亦尤便利,回誰家都可以,兩頭兼顧。而回家無非指的是過年而已,當代現狀,我想大多都是小兩口在某個大城市打拼,離雙方家庭都不近。況且以此邏輯,若是贅婿,反倒是女方該付彩禮給男方吧?我聽聞確實有地區持有此規矩,如果身處這種規矩不雙標的地方,我甚至可以贊同這一點。 上述三點有一個共通點,就是我明示我不要孩子、冠姓權、可以入贅之後,她們能淡定地回一句「那我不要你的彩禮了。」嗎?這些論點究竟是她們的真實論點,還只是套錢的藉口呢?尤其是第三點有親身體驗,我和她曾聊到過,我提及我可以婚後去你家,她並沒有鬆口,仍然堅持索取彩禮。 講個小插曲,日本贅婿,多出現在獨女家庭,岳父母真的是把贅婿當成是親兒子來對待,這位贅婿到時候會繼承女方家庭的家業財產。小仙女們聽到這類贅婿,怕是覺都睡不着吧?這可是過來搶錢的,她們勢必不讓男方入贅。敢動我的利益,那怎樣都不行。當然,我保留對日本這種狀況的看法,只是一則隨口一提的小故事。 豆瓣上更有甚者開始打共情牌,說我一個男的都覺得該付彩禮,你試想你以後的女兒你會不要彩禮嗎?聽得我都快笑了。我若會生女兒,說明我已經移居自由世界,我的女兒也將是一個在自由世界長大的人,我的答案是:確實不要。 哪怕我現在沒身處自由世界,在我的家鄉,重慶,也是沒有彩禮一說的。之前網路盛傳彩禮地圖的 meme,重慶赫然寫著 0 元,也曾是熱門話題。現在來了一個人,非得和我一個即將移居自由世界的重慶人扳彩禮,大概也只有說一句不合適而收尾吧。在我聽來,這就跟中國人疑惑為什麼不把拜登照片貼白宮門口的新蘇聯笑話一樣可笑,充斥著以己度人的鹽鹼地思想。 前幾天看見這樣一張截圖,當然出自著名的段子論壇,真實性存疑: 如果屬實的話,就太具有諷刺性了。只能說明真正要女方出彩禮的時候,她們自己也是不願意的,跟入贅的狀況如出一轍,她們真正的目的,只是想要錢。 原生家庭也能噁心到另一種程度,即是最近發酵的一個事件,B站一位寵物博主,女方家長要求 50 萬彩禮,不給不放人,強行帶走女方並毆打了當事人。明明也能碰見戀愛觀正常的女性,攤上這樣的原生家庭,也是另一種悲哀。以前也常有男方貸款給予彩禮的事件,這種情形下,女孩子嫁過去不就是一起還債的嗎?家庭能無理到此般地步,實在難逃其咎。彩禮只會在惡性社會事件下,名聲越來越臭。 一點象徵性的彩禮,討個彩頭,當作一項傳統習俗賦予一點儀式感都還好,怕就是怕這種貸款都得付的天價彩禮。可惜的是,我遇見的這位女利主義者是天價彩禮的代表,我們一起參加過她同學的婚禮,那對夫婦的情況是女方未婚先孕,她再次留下的金句是:「彩禮只給了幾萬,一定不能未婚先孕,不然彩禮就要不到高價了。」——這就是她對一位好友婚姻的概括和感想。好在我也得到了女性友人的共情,嘲諷她是在明碼標價。 至於天價彩禮的標準究竟為何,2021年4月7日,中華人民共和國民政部指定了十五個縣市區作為全國婚俗改革實驗區,同年9月22日,再新增 17 個第二批全國婚俗改革實驗區,明確要「打擊天價彩禮」。 以其中河南省商丘市寧陵縣為例,新的村規民約倡導彩禮不高於 3 萬元。 當然,人人都知道這是空頭支票。一來,一些天價彩禮最嚴重的地區根本沒有上榜,反倒川渝這些本來就幾乎沒有彩禮的地區有納入名單,根本是一場政治戲。二來,不會真有人因為彩禮超過規定而遭起訴,我的 ex 就是超過規定的天價彩禮代表,我會因此起訴她嗎?對正常人來講,起訴完也不必結婚了,實驗區的獎懲措施完全沒有效力。 後來因彩禮吵太多次了,她開始找藉口,說這是考驗心意,這是我特別反感聽到的一個理由。錢能考驗什麼心意呢?一定要讓男方傾家蕩產才叫考驗心意?面對富二代,你要開多高的彩禮來考驗心意呢,50 萬甚至 500 萬?即使 500 萬的天價,富二代都能再拿出來 5000 萬包十個情婦,這考驗不了任何心意。除非你也開一個讓富二代也得貸款才能搞定的價,但我不相信誰會蠢到接受。——事實上,支女不會為富二代老公再包了十個情婦而憤怒,因為她們已經撈夠了利益,為情婦放風都沒問題,利益足夠,萬事皆可。這是真正的物化自己,與女權背道而馳。花每一塊錢對每個人的效用不同,心意也體現在方方面面,感受不了我的心意就拉倒吧,好像弄得真非你不可似的。再者還是一個雙標問題,人人常說雙向奔赴,一個異地時一次沒來見過我的人,那麼你的心意又在哪呢?我絲毫未曾感受到。 引申一點,彩禮在當代有些許的定義改變。有些語境的彩禮不再指的是給女方家人,而是給女方本人,同時附上一定價值的嫁妝,婚後一起作為啟動資金來幫助一個新家庭。這種模式是完全可以接受的,但這種模式仍然有要求一個高於男方財力的天價數字的個例,就特別奇怪了。如果是嫌棄男方經濟條件太差的話,根本沒必要走到婚前談彩禮這一步了吧。…

  • |

    過時北美夢,巴黎症候群

    廬山煙雨浙江潮,未到千般恨不消。 到得還來別無事,廬山煙雨浙江潮。 蘇軾 《觀潮》 上世紀七八十年代,日本經濟高速發展,日本人揣著日益鼓起的錢包,蜂擁往海外四處遊山玩水。 巴黎,應是浪漫之都吧?凡爾賽宮的優雅,香榭麗舍的落葉。無處不充斥著他們的遐想。 然而當他們落地的一瞬間,幻想立即被無情打破。憧憬了半生的巴黎,原來就這破樣?這種反差太大,甚至讓一些人罹患上精神疾病,陷入一種崩潰紊亂的狀態。 這就是著名的「巴黎症候群」(パリ症候群),1991 年由日本精神科醫師太田博昭提出:日本人因為對巴黎存有過高的期望,誤認為法國人肯定比日本人好,但在實際接觸過巴黎這個城市後發現完全相反,不僅巴黎人也有粗魯的一面,而且那些高職位的法國白人的素質也很低下,他們的談吐、著裝、禮儀、收入、品位均達不到日本人幻想中的要求,甚至還不如普通的日本人,患者在此現實之下倍感無助[1]。 此症狀在 2004 年後正式被歐美承認,由 Viala 等人於法國精神病學雜誌《Nervure》中提及 [2],在醫學上分類為司湯達症候群的一種。 如此看來,我的症狀也愈發明顯,活生生熬成了一位罹患者。 甚至我是在壓根沒什麼高期望的情況下,仍然染病。 我一直奉行著那句話,移民不是去一個天堂,而是離開一個地獄。打從一開始,我就沒多大期望。況且這又不是我第一次出門,我旅居過的地方的數量遠超同齡人平均水平。於是在對比之下,都沒能挖掘出本地更多的亮點,尤其是和加拿大地位特別相似的澳洲,也許是那時候太年輕拿著家裡錢什麼都不用顧慮吧,在墨爾本的時候過得真是愜意太多。 無論如何,我無法排解愈待愈難熬的心情,惟有屢屢出現的窪地新聞,會短暫治療一下愛支病,回去,必然也不可能。 多麼滑稽,一問說不好,一勸就不回,我自己也變成了這種人。 我就是難民,流浪著,更宏觀概念下的 homeless。 張國榮曾旅居過溫哥華數年,後來又返回香港,留下這樣一句評價:「原來這邊的生活是這樣哦,又覺得好像少了什麼,像是在這裡等死似的。我以為加拿大是天堂啊,我去了才發覺不是啊,原來真正天堂是香港嘛。」 看到類似的言論時,我都會不由自主地瘋狂點頭。「等死」,尤為精確的形容。他說這句話時,香港還是 British HK,那確是天堂吧。香港已死,悲觀地宣告,世間再沒有任何一處是天堂。 還有非常幽默的一個論調,叫有錢了就好。再有錢能有錢過誠哥?問題是誠哥也拿著本加拿大護照住在香港。香港有三十萬加籍人口,位居亞洲之冠。可見拿身分,和挑自己要居住的地方,完全是兩碼事。如果說誠哥幾十年基業都在香港,自然住那,不就恰巧證明過往社會關係的紐帶很重要?那麼,我在《流浪母語》就提過,我太熱愛我過去的種種紐帶了。 MLA 的歌曲中,我最有共鳴的一首,是《你叫我譯一首德國歌詞》: 你叫我幫你譯一首德國歌詞並沒有說是為什麼事那首歌說向外面世界奔馳渴望那一天將至祈求風和雨吹我到理想的遠處故土沒法跟隨我意願但為什麼終於穿過海灣來到老遠卻很想返回我的屋邨你叫我幫你譯一首德國歌詞像在訴說著你心願拍拖 出國 交友 工作 生兒難道不是為逃避寂寞不斷?祈求風和雨吹我返故鄉的某處異國沒法消除我睏倦但為什麼終於返到故鄉鞋也未轉卻很想離去我的屋邨但為什麼終於穿過海灣來到老遠卻很想返回我的屋邨 My Little Airport 《你叫我譯一首德國歌詞》 初次聽到這首歌時,我甚至還沒出國,也像是靈魂瞬間被擊中。當然那時在澳門,仍是有一些相仿的心境,只是小日子過得美好,來不及胡思亂想。 現在「等死」中,時間太多太無聊,哪能不整天亂想? 歌詞甚至完全闡釋了我的困境,一問說不好,的確不好,異國沒法消除我睏倦;一勸就不回,當然不回,故土沒法跟隨我意願。 若是讓各種瑣碎之事堆滿時間再次麻痺自己,也只是逃避寂寞不斷,那些都不是內心真正想要的事情。 問題是,你想找事情做也找不到,無聊就是根本的問題。我本即是徹頭徹尾的城市人,亞洲大城市,很難去適應四大鄉村國家的生活。香港人的不適應感,大概也一樣。我有拿著 BNO 去英國 5+1 的朋友,也痛斥著英國的種種不便,那可還是倫敦啊,「一個人如果厭倦了倫敦,那他也就厭倦了生活」的倫敦,讓我這種真正的村裡人情何以堪。 也許也只有其他潤友會有一點北美夢了吧,這話聽起來有些 racist。但就事實而言,不可否認,發展程度確有差距。像是印度今年才開了全國第一家 Apple 直營店,Tim Cook 親臨,一時還是一個大新聞。Apple 直營店,於國人而言再普通不過的東西,光重慶都有三家,Tim Cook 好多年前就來過重慶。再看看重慶最新的招商信息,就今天,引入了…

  • |

    《魁北克故事與短篇小說集: 新法蘭西的舊夢》樣章

    魁北克故事與短篇小說集:新法蘭西的舊夢 目錄 一位好奇的加拿大人… 3 澤利姆(故事)… 4 佚名… 6 卡納瓦加的鐘聲… 7 約瑟夫·杜特(Joseph Doutre)… 11 兄與妹… 12 歐內斯特·加農(Ernest Gagnon)… 28 失望的男人… 28 C. V. 杜邦(?-1845)… 32 弗朗索瓦絲·布呂農… 33 路易·呂西耶 (Louis Lussier) 63 他和她… 64 夢想與幸福… 68 P. B. 德·拉布呂耶爾… 71 蘇必利爾湖的海妖… 72 G. de B. 74 神秘之塔… 75 奧古斯特·阿尚特爾 (Auguste Achintre) 85 向亡者致敬… 86 盧西尼昂(A. Lusignan)… 99…

  • | |

    加國即享羊毛🐏

    薅了一整年羊毛,自己也挖掘到了一些網上羊毛博主都沒有涉及的領域,因此簡單匯總一下,條件都是極其簡單的,幾乎可以即拿的類型,沒有很多銀行羊毛要求的 Direct Deposit 條件,適合無工作學生黨。 Contents 金融機構類… 1 返利網站類… 2 積分計劃類… 3 出賣隱私類… 4 彩票賭場類… 6 定期帳單類… 6 金融機構類 雖然銀行一般要求苛刻,大多有 Direct Deposit 的條件,讓無工作學生黨很頭疼,但也有一些比較容易的。另外信用卡也不符合範疇,因為我們脆弱的信用分是不適合太多 Credit Check 的,整理簡單即拿的羊毛更為重要了。 銀行 Tangerine Tangerine 是很靠譜的一家網路銀行,活期利率高於所有大行,薅完以後也可保持常用,唯一需要注意的是他家有 Inactivity Fee,一年 c$10,因此記得一年內至少交易一次。根據目前的 ToS,Tangerine 在使用推薦碼的前提下,存入 c$250 60 天即可獲得 c$50 獎勵,簡單及時,不像許多銀行處處埋坑,拖很久都發不出來獎勵。歡迎使用我的推薦碼(Orange Key):70539322S1。 EQ Bank 同樣是一家網路銀行,與 Tangerine 極其類似,目前活動是用邀請連結註冊 30 天內存入 c$100 可獲 c$20 獎勵,一週內獎勵就能發下來,很快。並且這張卡完全沒有隱藏費用,包括最坑人的 inactivity fee,所以不想用完全當作抽屜卡也沒關係,值得一薅。 歡迎使用我的邀請連結:點擊此處。 CIBC…

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *